Operator vs interactor model of care in manual physical therapy

This post is a repost of a comment +John Ware posted at somasimple forum. It is a highly recommended and brilliant piece of writing on the operator model of care vs the interactor model of care in manual physical therapy.

Full original post: http://goo.gl/vt41Ad

I'm afraid this argument boils down to a philosophical one in the end. That is, there are those, like ginger, who espouse an operator model of care, who acknowledge the finer points of the neurophysiology involved with manual therapies, the presence of CNS changes, like cortical smudging, the rationality of a neurodynamics perspective, etc.

And then there are those, including the moderators at SomaSimple and other members here, who, to varying degrees, promote an interactor model of care. While we are in agreement with the ectodermal-operators on all of these finer points of the relevant neurophysiology, we dramatically depart course from them on how best to apply this knowledge to achieve enduring change in the patient's pain problem. The key distinction here is that the interactor model doesn't stop at the individual patient; rather, it extends beyond the boundaries of just that individual to the culture within which that pain problem exists. For ultimately the problem of pain reflects glitches and defects in the culture, in particular the culture of health and medicine. I think the epidemiology literature relevant to chronic pain is strong evidence of this. The operators don't connect those dots, and I think that's a huge mistake. I think it's driven by what most human failings are driving by: ego.

The operator model of care completely ignores the influence their interventions have on the culture writ large. They are singularly devoted to the patient in front of them; but how can you divorce a patient with a persistent mechanical pain problem from the culture in which that problem developed? We know that the words we use are critically important in the meaning that patients ascribe to their condition- and where do these words come from? What gives them their meaning and power to influence our patients in such dramatic and often debilitating ways?

The answer is the culture. Interactive physical therapy embraces the uncertainty that necessarily follows from moving with the uncertain fluctuating tide of cultural shifts, paying close attention to subtle changes in meaning and interpretation of what it means to be healthy. Operative physical therapy is static and pays little attention to what goes on beyond the walls of the treatment room, until some RCT comes along that forces them to swap out one of their beloved tools.

I'm reminded of the great Tsunami in Indonesia some years back. A few people noticed the strangeness of the extreme low tide, packed up and left. Most, however, reacted with a shrug and "huh, that's kinda weird". Many of them drowned.

h/t +Sigurd Mikkelsen www.twitter.com/sigmik

#MT   #lft  

SomaSimple Discussion Lists – View Single Post – Ginger’s Ad Homs, Grumblings & Ramblings
SomaSimple: The So Simple Body, Forums for Health professions, physical therapy, physiotherapists, pain management, research

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Følg meg flere steder:

Du finner info fra meg på følgende steder.

No comments yet.

Legg igjen en kommentar

CommentLuv badge